Common Appraisal Methods and Their Comparison
| Method | Definition | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| 360-Degree Feedback | Collects feedback from peers, subordinates, supervisors, and sometimes clients. |
• Provides a holistic view of performance • Reduces individual bias • Promotes self-awareness and team harmony |
• Can be time-consuming to execute • Risk of conflicting or vague feedback • May require training to interpret constructively |
| Management by Objectives (MBO) | Measures performance against specific, pre-set individual goals. |
• Aligns personal and organizational goals • Encourages measurable outcomes • Enhances focus and accountability |
• May not adapt well to fast-changing priorities • Can overlook non-quantifiable contributions • Needs frequent goal realignment |
| Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS) | Uses behavior-based examples to rate performance on a scale. |
• Adds clarity and objectivity to evaluations • Links ratings to real actions • Reduces subjectivity and ambiguity |
• Complex and time-intensive to develop • Requires role-specific customization • Can be rigid in dynamic roles |
| Continuous Performance Management | Involves regular, informal check-ins to track progress and offer feedback. |
• Encourages ongoing dialogue • Supports agile goal-setting • Builds trust and responsiveness |
• Demands consistent manager engagement • Can lose structure without documentation • Requires cultural buy-in |
| Rating Scales | Uses a numeric or descriptive scale to rate various competencies. |
• Easy to implement across departments • Time-efficient for large teams • Standardized and familiar |
• Lacks context without comments • Prone to subjectivity or central tendency bias • May feel impersonal |
| Self-Assessment | Employees evaluate their own performance and development. |
• Promotes self-reflection and responsibility • Encourages two-way feedback • Surfaces unseen efforts or challenges |
• Risk of inflated or overly modest ratings • Needs balance with manager input • May be uncomfortable for some employees |
| Critical Incident Method | Tracks notable instances of outstanding or poor performance throughout the year. |
• Focuses on specific, real-world examples • Useful for coaching and recognition • Reduces bias from recent events |
• Requires ongoing documentation • Can be time-intensive for managers • Might miss consistent, steady performance |
The appraisal cycle is more than just a corporate ritual. Setting clear paths and having real talks makes people feel like they matter, are backed up, and want to do great work. It is not just judging the past but connecting with the future, one talk at a time.
Quiz Time!!!
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is the ideal frequency of performance appraisals?
Traditionally, appraisals were done annually. However, many companies now adopt more frequent cycles i.e. quarterly or biannually, to offer timely feedback and adjust goals as needed. Some also supplement formal reviews with monthly or ongoing check-ins.
2. How can employees prepare for their appraisal?
Employees should reflect on their achievements, challenges, and lessons learned during the cycle. Gathering evidence such as project outcomes, feedback received, and completed goals can help present a strong, well-rounded self-assessment.
3. What if an employee disagrees with their appraisal results?
It is important to have a transparent conversation. Employees should ask for specific examples, clarify expectations, and express their perspective calmly. Constructive dialogue often helps bridge understanding and improve future performance.
4. Are appraisals only linked to salary hikes and promotions?
While appraisals influence compensation, they also play a broader role in career development. They help identify training needs, succession planning, and personal growth opportunities, even if a raise isn’t immediately tied to the outcome.
5. Can performance appraisals be biased? How can this be avoided?
Yes, biases can creep in, such as favoritism, recency bias, or stereotyping. To reduce this, organizations use structured tools like 360-degree feedback, BARS, and objective metrics. Training managers to evaluate fairly also plays a crucial role.

Comments
Add comment